Shri Mataji often speaks about great personalities such as artists and scientists and connects them with her Sahaja Yoga theory.
(I find the term “Sahaja Yoga theory” appropriate because outside of mathematics there are no absolute proofs and therefore everything is a theory. Shri Mataji herself says that we should examine Sahaja Yoga like scientists and either accept or reject it. Thus, Sahaja Yoga remains a theory and not a proven fact. It is up to everyone to believe in it or not.)
Einstein has written about it. He said he was very tired while trying to find the words to express his theory of relativity, and he could not understand it. So he said, “I got so fed up in the laboratory, I went home and started playing with soap bubbles, and suddenly from somewhere unknown the whole theory dawned upon me.” This unknown is what he called the torsion area, an area that lies beyond us and beyond our mental self.
Source: [1]
There are the Special and General theories of relativity (also theories).
The General Theory of Relativity describes how matter curves space-time and how this curvature causes gravity.
The Special Theory of Relativity, on the other hand, is based on two fundamental principles:
Example: Person A and person B are standing at the same location and a beam of light is emitted from there in direction X. Now A moves in direction X and B moves in the opposite direction. For both A and B, the light beam (counterintuitively) still travels at the speed of light; there is no addition of velocities.
It seems to me that Shri Mataji often says things without being fully informed about them and that she does not always care whether what she says is correct.
If one is a Sahaja Yogi, one does not question what Shri Mataji says because she is the Adi Shakti. But if one reflects on it, much of it does not make sense.
It is a bad quality to speak from partial knowledge, because it undermines one’s authority – and all the more so if one claims to be God and all-knowing.
How can I know whether she also speaks from partial knowledge or invents things when it comes to spiritual topics? Spiritual matters cannot be verified, yet I am expected to believe everything and not think for myself. When it concerns things of the physical world, I can question them and compare them with reality. This allows me to evaluate the quality of her statements. Therefore I can assume the same quality for spiritual topics which are unverifiable.